Great camera pouch for S90 (8)


    June 28th, 2010 | Tags: , | Posted in Reviews

    The Canon PowerShot S90 camera pouch I bought budgetgadgets.com is fantastic! The S90 is more manageable during outings now. Previously I had to keep the S90 in my bag or pants pocket or even worst – hold in my hands. Now? Just sling it across my body and walk around. 2 free hands and camera within reach to capture that special moment.

    The tripod mount at the bottom piece holds the Canon S90 securely to the pouch. So don’t worry about the camera dropping out of the pouch if you decide to lug it around without the top flap. Yes, the top flap is detachable.

    You might want to change the strap to some tougher alternatives. The strap that comes with it looks a little flimsy and mine is slightly worn after using it for a while. Overall, it is a good camera pouch! If you decide to get one too, check out the product link: Canon Digital Camera Hard Leather Case Bag Pouch S90. While you are at it, check out other camera bags, cases and straps available at budgetgadgets.

    Use the discount code “LM5OFF8″ (without the quotes) to get 5% off site-wide discount at budgetgadgets.com.

    Nokia X6 – the perfect entertainment device? (2)


    March 11th, 2010 | Tags: , , , , , , | Posted in Reviews, Tech

    The Nokia X6 is the latest Symbian-based music phone with 32GB of on-board memory, 3.2inch capacitive touch screen, packed in a candy bar form-factor. Best of all, Nokia has thrown in Comes with Music for the 32GB version, allowing you access to the hottest hits anytime.

    The 13.8mm thick Nokia X6 doesn’t come with any slider keyboard. In fact, physical keyboard is redundant due to the capacitive touch screen. Why have a physical keyboard when you have a on screen keyboard? Buttons are also kept to a minimal on the Nokia X6 – Power & USB on the top; Volume controls, unlock & camera on the right side; and SIM card slot on the left of it screen. That’s all.

    Read the rest of this entry »

    Bittorrent on A.C.Ryan PlayOn!HD (84)


    September 17th, 2009 | Tags: , , , , , , | Posted in Guides, Tech

    Getting the A.c. Ryan Playon!HD + Wireless USB Dongle

    btpd_speedtestTotal speed of 395kBps on the A.C.Ryan PlayOn!HD

    Are you having slow speeds for the BitTorrent on the A.C.Ryan PlayOn!HD Media Player? Saw quite a handful of discussion regarding the slow speed and decided to tweak the settings a bit. I managed to find some time this evening to toy with the media player. After 15 minutes of digging and tweaking, I managed to clock 395kBps using the BitTorrent on the A.C.Ryan PlayOn!HD.

    Some information I found:

    • BitTorrent program is btpd
    • btpd is commonly found in appliances that supports BitTorrent
    • btpd on the A.C.Ryan PlayOn!HD doesn’t support encryption
    • A.C.Ryan had implemented it to run off default port (6881)
    • A.C.Ryan PlayOn!HD’s web interface doesn’t allow user to change the default BitTorrent port

    Personally, I feel that running BitTorrent off default port is a bad idea as most Internet Service Provider (ISP) throttles BitTorrent traffic. Running off default port just makes it easier for ISP to identify and throttle the speed. Therefore, we would want to change this port number to allow BitTorrent to pick up some speed. Another important point to note is that the btpd on the media player doesn’t support encryption. So the BitTorrent traffic can easily be identified by the clever network devices our ISPs have and speed will drop again.

    Another point – appliances have limited resources. These media players are not as powerful as our personal computer hence we might wish to optimize the available resources. One way to keep resource usage under control is to limit the number of peers the BitTorrent would connect to. More peers generally means higher speed but more peers definitely means more resources being consumed. Less available resources generally means lower speed. Go figure where is your balance.

    In this guide, we will be changing the BitTorrent port to 12345. If you would like to use another port, just replace every instance of 12345 with your own port number. I would be limiting the number of peers to 48. Just change this number to your liking. If you have a router, do remember to do the necessary port-forwarding.

    Read the rest of this entry »

    Perodic M1 Mobile Broadband Review (Speedtest) (11)


    May 13th, 2009 | Tags: , , , , , | Posted in Life, Reviews, Tech

    Noticed the speed of M1′s mobile broadband/broadband on mobile is really irregular. I have had times of terrible speeds, terrible latency in the range of tens of thousands ms. On lucky days I get my fair share of the speed I am entitled to.

    My equipments
    As I do not have a USB dongle, my Nokia E51 doubled up as my 3.5g modem. The mobile connection is shared out to my iPod Touch (2G) through JoikuSpot.

    Monitoring procedure
    I use mobile on broadband frequently – reading news and mails, downloading apps on iPod Touch, surfing blogs of friends, etc. At times, the response is really sluggish on mobile broadband. So I would try to do speedtest regularly to track the performance of M1 Mobile Broadband.

    The results

    M1 Mobile Broadband Speed Tests (May 2009)

    M1 Mobile Broadband May 2009 Speed Test Result

    Read the rest of this entry »

    DIR-855 wireless speed (1)


    March 1st, 2009 | Tags: , , | Posted in Reviews, Tech

    Was wondering what would be the wireless throughput of the DIR-855. Put together a simple test by transferring files off my network share onto my laptops.

    Equipments used

    • D-Link DIR-855 on firmware 1.12WW
    • Fujitsu S6520 (wireless – Intel 5300)
    • HP EliteBook 2530p (wireless – Broadcom 4322AG)
    • D-Link DNS-323
    • D-Link DNS-343

    Read the rest of this entry »


    Advertisements



    Treat shadowandy!


    Like to treat shadowandy a cup of Starbucks?

    Recent Comments



    Friend's Blog



    Interesting Links



    Previous Postings



    Copyright © 2005 - 2012 www.shadowandy.net  120 queries. 0.942 seconds.Go back up ↑